Premium beef — economics & ROI

Steady-state (year 3+), premium direct-sales model near Stockholm: Angus, ~80% sold direct as subscription boxes (~265 SEK/kg blended), leased land, outdoor wintering, organic + naturbete + young-farmer support. Owner-operator basis (your labour funds your income, not costed). All figures SEK, ex-VAT — planning estimates, not quotes.

30-cow owner income
1.30M
per year, steady-state
Your cash in (equity)
285k
leased land keeps capital low
From your selling skill
~590k
premium uplift vs commodity /yr
Net margin
~59%
incl. subsidies

1 · Capital in vs profit out, by herd size

Your cash at risk stays small (leased); annual profit dwarfs it. Profit split into the standalone business (blue) and subsidies (orange).

Your cash in (equity)
Business profit (excl. subsidy)
Subsidies

2 · Where the ~1.30M comes from (30 cows)

Read your owner income honestly: a third is subsidy, a chunk is what plain commodity farming would earn, and the rest is what your selling adds.

Commodity-level business
Premium uplift (your selling)
Subsidies
The aqua slice is the real investment case — the profit your go-to-market ability converts, on almost no extra capital.

3 · Downside is soft, upside tracks your selling

30-cow net profit under four selling outcomes. Even the commodity floor is cash-positive (subsidies cushion it) — the risk is a smaller reward, not a loss.

Business profit (excl. subsidy)
Subsidies (≈constant)

4 · The prize: profit your selling skill adds

Premium direct vs selling everything to the abattoir — the pure return on your go-to-market ability, by herd size. Near-zero extra capital to capture it.

Extra profit /yr from premium direct selling
Show all data

Open questions

What the returns depend on that the dashboard cannot know.

QuestionWhy it mattersWhere the answer comes from
What will a bank actually lend against a leased holding, and at what rate?BlockingThe model assumes 75% debt at 4.5%. Security over rented land is weaker, so both the share and the rate may be worse — and the equity-at-risk figure moves with them.Two agricultural banks and Landshypotek; ask specifically what security they take when the land is leased.
Should the owner's labour be charged in the headline figure?ImportantThe dashboard can show it either way. At ~1,500 hours a year, charging labour moves the result by roughly 345,000 SEK — the difference between a business and a job.A decision, not a search: pick one basis and use it consistently in every version shown to a lender.
Is the ROI-on-equity figure meaningful when the capital base is deliberately small?ImportantLeasing keeps capital at risk low, which flatters the ratio. The absolute profit and the margin are the honest metrics.Present absolute profit first in any external document; keep ROI as a secondary figure.

How to read this. Owner-operator basis: your full-time labour is not subtracted, so "profit" blends your salary and business profit — the standalone-business figure is the blue portion. ROI-as-a-percentage looks very high only because leasing keeps capital at risk small; the meaningful metrics are the absolute annual profit, the ~59% margin, and the aqua "return on your selling skill." Years 1–2 are an investment phase (herd + subscriber base building, cash-negative) not shown here. Assumes you secure ~60 ha of qualifying leased pasture and build/retain ~270 subscriber households. Model assumptions: Angus 320 kg carcass, 0.92 calving × 0.94 survival, 2 ha/cow, 75% loan at 4.5%, Swedish 2025–26 subsidy rates. Estimates for planning, not financial advice.