Every page in this plan repeats the same warning: you must move mince and stew, not just steak. None of them has ever put a number on it. This page does — it turns a 320 kg carcass into kilograms by cut, prices each one at what Swedish producers actually charge, and shows what the product mix is worth. It is the one lever that moves margin without moving the headline price.
That is 10,000–14,000 SEK per animal, or 500,000–700,000 SEK a year at 50 head, from changing how the meat is packaged rather than what it costs to produce. For comparison, a 15% rise in the box price — which the competitor page shows there is no room for — would earn less.
The catch is the other 85% of the animal. Every premium kilo you sell separately leaves a box that is more mince and less steak, and someone still has to want it. The whole problem of this business is in that sentence.
Move the share of premium cuts sold separately and watch both the revenue and the leftover box composition change. Prices are the direct-sale anchors verified on the competitor page; the cut-share split is modelled — see the honest-gaps note at the end.
The same animal shown twice: by weight, and by revenue. The gap between the two charts is the entire argument of this page.
Revenue per animal as more of the premium cuts are sold individually rather than inside a mixed box. The curve is the margin lever; the dashed line is the all-in-boxes baseline.
One carcass, cut by cut: kilograms, the price each earns as a separate cut, and what the same meat is worth inside a mixed box.
A carcass is not a menu. The animal decides the proportions, and roughly half of it is mince and stewing meat whatever you do. Any strategy that sells the top 15% separately has to find homes for the rest at a price that still works.
There are only four homes: mixed boxes (which need a premium cut inside to be attractive), value-added products (which need equipment, an approved kitchen and time), restaurants (which want the premium cuts, not the mince), and the abattoir price (which is the floor and earns nothing extra).
The practical resolution is a two-tier offer: a standard box that always contains one premium cut, plus a separate à-la-carte list for households and restaurants that want steak specifically. That captures most of the cut premium while keeping the box worth buying — and it is what the strongest competitor on the price survey already does.
What this page could not settle, why each answer changes a decision, and where it has to come from. Blocking means do not commit capital until it is answered.
| Question | Why it matters | Where the answer comes from |
|---|---|---|
| What is your cutting plant's actual yield sheet, cut by cut?Blocking | The entire product range and its pricing sit on this split. A few percentage points on the premium cuts is thousands of kronor per animal, and the modelled split here is the weakest number on the page. | The approved cutting plant, at the quoting stage. They cut to a standard spec and will have the yields even though nobody publishes them. |
| Will households actually buy à-la-carte cuts, or only boxes?Blocking | The whole 10,000–14,000 SEK per animal upside assumes the premium cuts find buyers at cut prices. If they do not, they go back in the box and the gain disappears. | Test it in one REKO season: offer both, and see what the same customers choose. |
| What can a restaurant absorb, at what price and how reliably?Important | Restaurants are the natural home for premium cuts at volume, which is exactly what makes the boxes harder to fill. The trade-off has to be sized before it is committed to. | Three Stockholm restaurants: ask what they pay per kilo for entrecôte and oxfilé, in what quantity and on what payment terms. |
| Is there an approved kitchen for value-added products, and what does it cost?Important | Sausage and broth are how the difficult 40% earns more than mince prices — but they need approved premises, which is a separate registration and a real cost. | The cutting plant may offer it as a service; otherwise the kommun's food-control unit on what approval is needed. |
| What do bones, fat and offal earn or cost?Background | They are ~8% of the carcass and are currently modelled as worth nothing. Broth and dog food are real products; disposal is a real cost. | The cutting plant's terms on what is returned and what they charge to dispose of the rest. |
Prepared August 2026 as a planning aid. The cut-out split is modelled from published box compositions and standard carcass anatomy, not from a published Swedish yield sheet — treat it as a planning frame to be replaced by your cutting plant's own figures. Prices are producers' published consumer prices in SEK including 12% moms at August 2026 and mix regions; per-kg revenue figures here are therefore not directly comparable with the ex-VAT figures used in the economics pages until one basis is chosen. Meat yield and slaughter yield ranges are from Swedish and international published studies. Not financial advice.